Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis

Por um escritor misterioso
Last updated 12 abril 2025
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
The study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in All-on-4 implant-supported fixed maxillary prostheses with three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The model of complete edentulous maxilla was created using the Rhinoceros and VRMesh Studio programs. Anterior vertical and 17°- and 30°-angled posterior implants were positioned with All-on-4 design. Straigth and angled multi-unit abutments scanned using a 3D scanner. Two different prosthetic superstructures (monolithic zirconia framework and lithium disilicate veneer (ZL) and monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) were modeled. Four models designed according to the prosthetic structure and posterior implant angles. Posterior vertical bilateral loading and frontal oblique loading was performed. The principal stresses (bone tissues-Pmax and Pmin) and von Mises equivalent stresses (implant and prosthetic structures) were analyzed. In all models, the highest Pmax stress values were calculated under posterior bilateral loading in cortical bone. The highest von Mises stress levels occured in the posterior implants under posterior bilateral load (260.33 and 219.50 MPa) in the ZL-17 and ZL-30 models, respectively. Under both loads, higher stress levels in prosthetic structures were shown in the ZLS models compared with ZL models. There was no difference between posterior implant angles on stress distribution occurred in implant material and alveolar bone tissue. ZLS and ZL prosthetic structures can be reliably used in maxillary All-on-4 rehabilitation.
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Effects of Different Positions and Angles of Implants in Maxillary Edentulous Jaw on Surrounding Bone Stress under Dynamic Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Contemporary all on 4.pdf
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Full-Arch, Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Prosthetic Treatment, June 2020
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Finite element model. A vertical load of 200N was applied at the
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Finite Element Analysis and Its Applications in Dentistry
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Life, Free Full-Text
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant‐Supported Prostheses: A Three‐Dimensional Finite Element Study - Yu - 2023 - Journal of Prosthodontics
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Effects of Different Positions and Angles of Implants in Maxillary Edentulous Jaw on Surrounding Bone Stress under Dynamic Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
PDF) Effect of Material Type on the Stress Distribution in Posterior Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Life, Free Full-Text
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Implant Practice US April/May 2015 Issue - Vol8.2 by MedMark, LLC - Issuu
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Angled implants
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Angulated Implant Placement in the Posterior Maxilla to Avoid Sinus Augmentation and Improve Prosthesis Support: A Case Report - Oral Health Group
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior  implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite  element analysis
Full article: Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

© 2014-2025 trend-media.tv. All rights reserved.