Idea] Turbofish replacement - language design - Rust Internals

This is not an Pre-RFC yet, I’ll write one when it collects some hype and initial bikesheddings for it. The idea here is a new syntax which does exactly what fn-call-after-turbofish does currently, but fancier. It basically looks like this. mem::size_of(:T); iter.collect(:Vec<_>); make_array(:u8, :64, 0); do_something(:T, :U, a, b); So function call arguments can be started with optional type arguments. Type arguments are started with :, and interpreted in type context. All type arguments mus

RFC] Undo universal impl Trait : r/rust

Tracking Issue for `c…` string literals · Issue #105723 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub

What syntax design choices do you love, and what do you hate? : r/ProgrammingLanguages

Defaults Affect Inference in Rust: Expressions Instead Of Types - Faultlore

Learning Rust through open source and live code reviews

Request coalescing in async Rust

Pain Points - A Gentle Introduction to Rust

Tracking issue for const generics (RFC 2000) · Issue #44580 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub

How to build a blockchain in Rust - LogRocket Blog

Planet Mozilla

Planet Mozilla

Generic function failing to satisfy any lifetime on argument - help - The Rust Programming Language Forum

Announcing safety-dance: removing unnecessary unsafe code from popular crates : r/rust

Planet Mozilla

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)